贴心姐妹网
 · 设为主页 | · 添加收藏 | · 会员注册 | · 会员登录    +
 
首页 | 社会政治 | 职场创业 | 情感关系 | 子女成长 | 多元生活 | 文化艺术 | 社区公益

Suburban monumentalism: How do we change Indigenous-settler relations when there are no statues to destroy?

来源:The Conversation   更新:2021-07-20 04:43:34   作者:Patricia Landolt, Professor of Sociology, University of Toronto,Paloma E. Villegas Assistant Professor, Sociology, California State University San Bernardino

Across Canada’s cities, protesters have defaced statues and monuments to help rewrite Indigenous-settler relations.

 

Powerful messages overlay the destruction: red handprints, “clean water-land back,” “we were children,” “respect the treaties” and “215.”


Read more: Amid more shocking residential schools discoveries, non-Indigenous people must take action


But the suburbs have escaped this political reckoning for a mix of reasons. They’ve been written into our imagination as an empty land without history ready to be occupied and manicured. For more than a century, city-dwellers have been escaping the chaos of the city for the burbs.


Our understanding of the suburbs as a place without history is a violent fiction of settler-colonialism. We suggest the term suburban monumentalism to explain how the suburban-built environment contributes to Indigenous dispossession and settler-colonial violence.

 

Suburban monumentalism is an oxymoron. Unlike its urban cousin, suburban monumentalism does not occupy remarkable public spaces. As a result, it flies under the radar of political confrontation.


Read more: Canada needs to reckon with the relics of its colonial past, including racist statues


Absent statues and public squares, suburban monumentalism weaves stories of ordinary settler families into the landscape. It erases Indigenous peoples from the land. Streets, subdivisions, schools and baseball fields carry the names of “founding” settler families. Church museums, cemeteries and historical plaques celebrate the ingenuity and industry of the settler.

 

In this quaint and barely noticeable form, the suburbs build on the cultural narrative of escape from urban chaos to erect a built environment that celebrates Indigenous dispossession. Occupying space alongside cookie cutter subdivisions and megamalls, suburban monumentalism is just bland enough to escape scrutiny.

 

Scarborough’s suburban monumentalism

 

Scarborough, a bustling suburban region of Toronto, has key features of suburban monumentalism. Scarborough has been a site of settlement, migration and crossing for thousands of years. It has been a disputed territory for at least 200 years as Indigenous peoples have challenged settlement on unceded land and the duplicity of the treaty process. Indigenous people continue to live and shape the area, as well as fight for return of the land.

 

All of this complexity and contentious political history is largely absent from Scarborough’s monuments and built environment.

 

Scarborough’s naming conventions weave a settler-origin story into the land. The Thomson family appears in the naming of David and Mary Thomson Collegiate, Thomson Memorial Park and in the collections of the Scarborough Historical Museum.

 


 

A plaque in Scarborough’s St. Andrew’s Presbyterian Church cemetery. (Patricia Landolt), Author provided

 

Historical plaques erase Indigenous histories and presence on the land. A plaque in Scarborough’s St. Andrew’s Presbyterian Church cemetery reads:

 

“West of this point passed an Indian Trail leading to prehistoric Indian villages of which traces have been found. This was the Trail by which David Thomson, the first white settler in Scarborough, came to the site upon which he built his house in 1796.”

 

The plaque refers to an “old Indian road,” illustrating the myth of the Thomson family discovering and settling a largely uninhabited space. In Scarborough, the settler account suggests that Indigenous presence only leaves traces.


Read more: Why activists are vandalizing statues to colonialism


The erasure of Indigenous people and the violation of treaty relations is naturalized through repetition. Every year, scores of school kids visit the Scarborough Museum and learn about the Thomsons building their first cabin and celebrating how hardy they were.

 

These stories and the nondescript plaques that accompany them are instructive. They instil views about land and history. And in such stories, Indigenous peoples remain unnamed, invisible or assumed not present while settlers’ names are woven into the suburban landscape as a natural presence.


 

A plaque located along Highland Creek by a dog park at the University of Toronto’s Scarborough campus. (Patricia Landolt), Author provided

 

Suburban monumentalism also celebrates settler’s taming nature through work, perseverance and industry. A plaque located along Highland Creek by a dog park at the University of Toronto’s Scarborough campus describes the succession of mills that flourished on the creek in the 1840s. It reads: “The early settlers of Scarborough used the waters of Highland Creek to provide power for their many saw and grist mills …”

 

There was careful planning regarding the language used and plaque placement. The plaque holds the authority of history and the detail on the plaque encourages the passing onlooker to not question its veracity.

 

Suburban truth-work for re/conciliation

 

Surburban monumentalism is present across Canada’s cities. It replicates this bland account of our history through naming conventions, barely noticeable landmarks and a common man approach to the public record. In each case the narratives erase Indigenous presence from the land, replace it with settler-colonial foundations and simplify Indigenous-settler relations.

 

The practice is never accidental, it is a purposeful and political act refashioned as our shared history. We need to recognize that the work of rewriting the settler-colonial violence of the suburbs will take political awakening, a lot of dialogue and maybe a little vandalism.

 

link: Suburban monumentalism: How do we change Indigenous-settler relations when there are no statues to destroy?

分享到: 更多
相关文章
[社会政治] Biden wins – experts on what it means for race relations, US forei
[社会政治] True or false? Men and women face violence in their relationships
[情感关系] Feeling Stressed? Try Sniffing Your Romantic Partner's Shirt
[社会政治] Sure, your heart thumps, but let’s look at what’s happening physic
[社会政治] The troubling U.S.-China face-off
[社会政治] Examining U.S.-Mexico ties in the age of Trump
发表评论
您必须登录后才能发表评论![立即登录] 还没有注册会员?[立即注册]  
Loving Sister 于 2021-07-21 13:00:52 评论道: 的确。亚裔移民的贡献问题则比较复杂。亚裔移民有贡献,另一方面也是殖民项目中的一部分,作为移居者,也造成原住民失去家园。正如平權會聲明:“我們的到來一方面助長了加拿大殖民化過程, 使原住民流離失所。另一方面原住民與華裔在歷史上也有互相團結”。(http://lovingsister.com/news_detail/index.php?news_id=36978)
Qingmu 于 2021-07-20 17:26:25 评论道: 到處都是這樣。原住民的痕跡被清洗很多遍了。所有的敘述和發現和命名都是從歐洲殖民者角度。比如各種國家公園,在介紹時全部說某某探險家發現,某攝影者或誰發現並傳,對這裡其實是原住民家園幾乎不敏感。後來比如亞裔移民到對農業、漁業的巨大開發貢獻哪裡可見提到呢,沒有一個被命名的..
 
会员登录
用户名:
密 码:
 
· 关于我们 About Us · 用户条约 Terms and Conditions · 隐私政策 Privacy Policy · 联系方式 Contact Us
版权声明:本网发布的内容版权归Lovingsister Media Inc. 所有,未经书面许可,严禁转载,违者将承担法律责任。
© 2013 Lovingsister Media Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized distribution, transmission or republication strictly prohibited.